The important part to know about the stimulus package-style of addressing economic malaise is that each person who receives these tax payer funds must spend, in majority, the funds in the markets for the stimulus to take any significant effect.
Many believe that spending the stimulus package funds exclusively on American products and services will serve to boost our markets more directly.
This may be true, but the bottom line is that using the funds along with savings to make wise investments or spending the money in American retailers and outlets is the only method by which any future packages would show any results.
Informing yourself on not only the best prices on the products you enjoy but which major retailers, energy companies and industries are of the best interest to our nation can lead not only to more stable markets but a greater degree of national security.
Economic strength and stability provides the higher quality intelligence services and personnel staying within the American interests.
For an informed American to claim they have their end of the economy handled in share, they would do well to understand a concept rarely addressed in any media format. The overall strength and robustness of any economy comes not from what is tracked as the DOW JONES or other market averages but rather within the actual number of jobs produced and inherent to that economy.
Also understanding that you are indeed putting real assets into the market by paying bills or with a highly modest fiscal investment, and need not make rash expensive purchases or risky investments to help build the economy up. In fact such actions may further degrade the once monolithic American markets.
Building a smart economy from the ground up is not outside the ability of any single American in help contribute towards.
Starting a small business, taking on a second or third job and hiring on more staffers to an existing business are not easy options for most Americans in 2008.
Nonetheless, these three options pose the greatest chance of enhancing the American economy in a very real way in days to come.
The last aspect of the market discussions in American mass media that is unaddressed is that each President cannot be held as strongly in referendum over the number of jobs created or lost under their Presidency as to the issue of the national budget.
Job loss or creation is a vital element of reviewing how well any President has governed over America but an epidemic of job loss or explosion of jobs could occur well outside the powers of office and at any time.
It is not to say that actions in office cannot hamper or stimulate job creation but rather that each job market is unique.